The couple had sold the exclusive right to publish their wedding photos to OK! Magazine. JK Rowling has described a common attitude of “you’re famous, you’re asking for it”.Īn example is found in the case concerning the actors Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones. This leads people, and often newspapers, to question whether they are in any position to criticise the media attention that surrounds them. Unlike private citizens, celebrities need to attract media attention in order to promote their work – perhaps their latest film or your favourite Netflix series. While many people may wonder what Royalty get up to on holiday, this is not enough to justify the invasion of privacy that the taking of clandestine photos leads to. The French court decided in favour of the Duke and Duchess and awarded compensation, showing that a distinction should be made between what the public are interested in and what is actually in the public interest. The magazine nonetheless argued there was a public interest in the relationship of future heirs to the throne. A Palace statement described the use of the images as “reminiscent of the worst excesses of the press and paparazzi during the life of Diana, Princess of Wales”. The pictures, showing the Royal couple relaxing at a private villa, had been taken from a distance with a long-lens camera. In 2012, topless photographs of the Duchess of Cambridge appeared on the front cover of a French magazine. The rights to privacy and free expression are of equal importance legally, so it can be a challenge to strike a balance between them. ![]() In the case of celebrity stories or photographs, Articles 8 (privacy) and 10 (expression) often come into conflict. For example, if a story is in the public interest, a judge may rule that the celebrity’s right to privacy should be limited for the greater purpose of informing the public. However, both rights are qualified (or restricted) rights – meaning they can be limited in certain situations. Since the Human Rights Act came into force in 2000, people have been able to assert these rights before the UK courts. The Human Rights Convention guarantees everyone’s right to privacy, as well as their right to free expression. The media interest in publishing such stories and images is clear, but digital technology means that celebrities’ personal and professional lives are now scrutinised more than ever before. This poses the question: do celebrities have a right to privacy, and if so, how far are we going to protect it? Privacy and Public Interest – A Balancing Act ![]() These may have been published and shared by thousands of people – and seen by many more. A quick online search of almost any celebrity will reveal a litany of stories and images – from red carpet appearances to what they eat for breakfast.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |